2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 99129
MADRAS HIGH COURT
THE BRANCH MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
B.DEEPA – Respondent
CMA 1928 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Second day of December Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN
CMA No.1928 of 2020
IN CMP.NO.14229 of 2020
THE BRANCH MANAGER [APPELLANT IN BOTH THE APPEALS/PETITIONS]
M/S.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
RELIANCE HOUSE, 6TH FLOOR,
NO.6, HADDOWS ROAD,
CHETPET, CHENNAI 6.
Vs
1 B.DEEPA [ RESPONDENTS IN BOTH THE APPEALS ]
2 MINOR SACHIN
S/O.LATE. BABU
3 MINOR POORNIMA
D/O.LATE. BABU
4 SAMINATHAN
5 S.KALA
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Under Section 173 of the
Motor Vechiles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated
16.04.2019 made in MCOP.No.638 of 2016 on the file of the Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal, Disrict and Sessions Court, Additional
District Court(FTC), Kanchipuram. (in CMA.1928/2020)and;
(ii) to grant stay of execution of the decree dated 16.04.2019
made in MCOP.No.638 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
Tribunal, District and Sessions Judge, Additioal District Court(FTC),
Kanchipuram. (in CMP.No.14229/2020) in AS.No.1928/2020 respectively.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing
the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon
hearing the arguments of M/S.S.ARUN KUMAR, Advocate for the appellant
in both the appeals/petitions the court made the following order:-
Notice to the respondents returnable by 25.01.2021. Private notice
is also permitted.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit
that it is a case of fatal accident. According to him, as per their
record, the policy was issued on 13.10.2008 vide Policy
No.12037823343001868 for the period from 13.10.2008 to 12.10.2009 and
on the date of accident, i.e., on 12.10.2008, there is no valid
Insurance Policy. However, the claimant produced a fake policy under
Ex.P.7 as if the policy was came into force on 10.10.2008 and would
expire in the midnight of 09.10.2009. Even though the Insurance
Company contested the matter stating that there is no valid policy at
the time of accident, the Tribunal, without considering the same,
fixed the liability on the Insurance Company.
3. Considering the above circumstances, There shall be an order
of interim stay on condition that the appellant shall deposit 50% of
the amount awarded by the Tribunal together with interest as on date
to the credit of MCOP No.638 of 2016 on the file of the Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal, District and Sessions Court, Additional
District Court (FTC), Kanchipuram, on or before 25.01.2021. If the
appellant fails to comply with the condition, the stay granted shall
stand automatically vacated without any further reference to this
Court.
Post on 25.01.2021.
-sd/-
22/12/2020
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. )
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, ADDL.DISTRICT COURT(FTC)
MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL,
(FTC), KANCHIPURAM.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
C.C. to M/S.S.ARUN KUMAR Advocate SR.NO.6502
Order
in
CMA.1928/2020
in CMP.NO.14229/2020
Date :22/12/2020
From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the Interim Orders in this format
SDR 30/12/2020
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/