MADRAS HIGH COURT
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
VIJI @ VIJAYALAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
Crl.OP.No.597 of 2023
Crl.OP.No.597 of 2023
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offences punishable
under Section 9(f), 10 r/w 17 of POCSO Act, 2012 in Crime No.12 of 2022 on
the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that the
petitioners along with others accused persons requested him to bring her minor
grand daughter (victim) in order to perform communication and other services
in the church. While so, A-1 forwarded obscene message to the victim and A-2
who is the wife of A-1 intimidated the victim not to declare the same to anyone.
It is further alleged that the petitioners A3 and A5 was also abetted. Hence, the
complaint.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioner is an innocent person and she has not been committed any such
offence as alleged by the prosecution and she has been falsely implicated in this
case. He further submits that the petitioner was doing service in the church
committee and she has no knowledge about the alleged act done by A-1. Hence,
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.