MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
P.RAJASEKARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE, REPRESENTED BY – Respondent
Crl.M.P.No.1113 of 2023
Crl.M.P.No.1113 of 2023
in
Crl.A.No.383 of 2020
P.VELMURUGAN,J.
When the main appeal came up before this Court on 06.01.2023, the
learned counsel for the appellant sought permission of this Court to peruse the
records. Therefore, this Court called for records and permitted the counsel for
the appellant to peruse the records and instructed him to argue the matter on the
next hearing.
2. Today (25.01.2023) when the matter came up before this Court,
instead of arguing the appeal, the counsel for the appellant/accused has filed
the present petition and would submit that the Form 91 was not marked before
the trial Court during trial. He would further submit that already approval was
granted by the CMDA and the appellant/accused was nothing to do with the
work to be done by the defacto complainant. Therefore, in order to secure the
ends of justice, the appellant/accused himself wanted to be examined as
defence side witness under Section 315 Cr.P.C. Hence, the appellant/accused
may be permitted to examine as defence witness and his evidence may be
treated as additional evidence. He also referred Section 391 Cr.P.C.
3. Heard the lea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.