2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 90987
MADRAS HIGH COURT
CHINNA AKKAMMA – Appellant
Versus
NAGAMMA, – Respondent
CRP 3824 2019
CRP No.3824 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
CRP No.3824 of 2019
1.
Chinna Akkamma
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,
praying to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 09.06.2017 made in I.A.No.757
of 2015 in O.S.No.189 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif, Hosur.
For petitioner
:
Mr.P.M.Jayachandran
For respondents :
Ms.V.Pavithra
for Ms.V.Srimathi
ORDER
This petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order dated
09.06.2017 made in I.A.No.757 of 2015 in O.S.No.189 of 1996 on the file of the
District Munsif, Hosur.
2.
The learned counsel for the petitoners/defendants submitted that the suit
was filed for partion on 06.10.1995 vide O.S.No.189 of 1996 on the file of the
District Magistrate, Hosur. The petitioners/defendants filed a written statement on
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP No.3824 of 2019
16.08.1996 and this revision petition was filed by the defendants 11,14 and 15 in the
suit. Preliminary ex parte decree was passed by the District Munsif Court, Hosur on
19.02.2007.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioners/defendants further submitted that
this civil revison petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the District
Munsif Court, Hosur in I.A.No.757 of 2015 which was filed to condone the delay of
3136 days to set aside the ex parte decree dated 19.02.2007.The reasons given for
the delay are stated in paragraph 5 of the affidavit in I.A.No.757 of 2015 which is
extracted below:
"5.
I submit that I got ill health during the year
2006 and suffering from giddiness often and not able to
follow up the matter pending before the Court. The
guidiness converted me as a sugar patient and at the inital
stage I stated treatment with the local doctors which pull
me into severe illness during the year 2009. They went to
Narayana Hirudayala Hospital for a prolonged illness and
I was under the frequent observation for the treatment and i
resided in my cousin brother Narayanasamy's house
situated in Odera Manchanahalli Village, Jigani Anekal
Taluk, banglore District. Due to which I cannot concentrate
about above suit pending before the Court."
Except the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No of 757 of 2015,
no other valid reason is given by the revision petioner's for the inordinate delay of
three years in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte order.
4.
Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiff submitted
that the suit in O.S.No189 of 1996 was filed for partiton on 06.10.1995 on the file of
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP No.3824 of 2019
the District Munsif Court, Hosur and the revision petitioners who are the defendants
11,14 and 15 had filed a written statement on 16.08.1996. Subsequently, the
preliminary decree was also passed on 19.02.2007 and final decree was passed in the
year 2010. The revision petitioners were set ex parte in the preliminary decree
application. The petition in I.A.No.757 of 2017 to set the ex parte decree was filed
on 16.11.2015 after a delay of eight years.
5.
The learned counsel for the respondents would further submit that the
plaintiff at the time of filing the suit was 52 years and now she is around 84 years
and a senior citizen.
6.
Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
7.
In the case on hand, the summoness were already served on the
defendants 11,14 and 15 and after receipt of the same, they have filed a written
statement on 16.08.1996. Subsequently, the defendants D11,D14 and D15 who are
the revision petitioners were set ex parte and preliminary ex parte decree was passed
by the District Munsif on 19.02.2007 and thereafter, a final decree was passed