SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 96922

MADRAS HIGH COURT
SARASWATHI – Appellant
Versus
KANNAN – Respondent
SA 1829 2002



S.A.No.1829 of 2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.04.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA

S.A.N

o.1829 of 2002

Saraswathi

... Appellant

..Vs..

1.Kannan

2.Lakshmanan Pillai

... Respondents

PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the

decree and judgment dated 29.06.2001 in O.S.No.98 of 2000 on the file

of the District Munsif Court, Nannilam, upholding the decree and

judgment in A.S.No.39 of 2001 dated 26.07.2002 on the file of the Sub

Court, Thiruvarur.

For Appellant

: No appearance

R1

: Died

For R2

: No appearance

1/2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.A.No.1829 of 2002

R. HEMALATHA, J.

mtl

JUDGMENT

When the second appeal came up for hearing on 03.04.2023,

there was no representation for the appellant and hence was directed to be

posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 05.04.2023. Even today, i.e.,

05.04.2023 there is no representation for the appellant.

2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non

prosecution. No costs.

05.04.2023

Index : Yes/No

Internet : Yes/No

mtl

To

1. The District Munsif Court, Nannilam

2. The Sub Court, Thiruvarur.

3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.1829 of 2002

2/2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top