2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 90712
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dr.R.Sathiamurthi – Appellant
Versus
L.Adimoolam – Respondent
OA 727 2016
1
O.A.Nos.727 and 728 of 2016
in C.S.No.600 of 2016
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
Applicant is the plaintiff in the suit filed for the following
reliefs:
(i) A permanent injunction restraining the
defendants, their partners, their employees, officers,
servants, agents and all others acting for and on their
behalf from using and alienating in any manner, directly
or
indirectly,
dealing
in
domain
name
www.dinamalar.com, www.dinamalar.in or any other
similar domains and mobile applications and softwares
bearing the word DINAMALAR in any language including
the labels amounting to an infringement of the plaintiff's
registered trademark No.1339618 in Class 16;
(ii) A permanent injunction restraining the
defendants, their partners, their employees, officers,
servants, agents and all others acting directly or indirectly
using the domains names
www.dinamalar.com,
www.dinamalar.in or any other similar domains and
mobile applications and software bearing the word
DINAMALAR in any language including the labels
amounting to passing off of the products and services of
the defendant as and for that of the plaintiff's mark
2
DINAMALAR;
(iii) The 1st defendant be ordered to surrender to
the plaintiff or in favour of all partners, the ownership of
the domains www.dinamalar.com and www.dinamalar.in
and any other domain bearing the mark DINAMALAR
including all mobile applications and softwares and also
provide with login ids, passwords and all other key
information to take over and operate the domains and
mobile applications;
(iv) The first defendant be ordered to pay
appropriate damages to the plaintiff for using plaintiff's
registered trademarks DINAMALAR;
(v) To direct the 1st defendant for rendition of
accounts pertaining to the domains www.dinamalar.com
and www.dinamalar.in and any other websites, domains
and mobile applications and softwares bearing the mark
DINAMALAR along with the profits made in respect of the
multiple mobile applications created by the first defendant
including from advertisements, branding, listings,
classifieds and any/all other revenues through use of the
mark DINAMALAR across the world;
(vi) The second defendant be directed to furnish
information pertaining to the registration and ownership
details of the website/domain www.dinamalar.com;
3
(vii)costs and such other relief as this Hon'ble Court
may deem fit, in the circumstances of the case, in the
interests of justice and equity.
2.Learned senior counsel for the applicant submits that the
registered trade mark DINAMALAR stands in the name of five
brothers including the applicant. There was already an award in
favour of the applicant in a dispute between the brothers. The first
respondent is the son of one of the brothers of the applicant. Now, the
first respondent is using the domain name with the name DINAMALAR
apart from using it in the mobile application. Learned senior counsel
submits that a third party right might arise since an attempt is being
made to alienate the usage. By operating the mobile application, the
access can be made immediately and this has been done recently.
Therefore, it is submitted that a prima facie case has been made out.
3.Considering the submissions made by the learned senior
counsel for the applicant and taking note of the fact that the
registered mark still stands in the name of the five brothers including
the applicant, this Court is of the view that a prima facie case has
been made out, especially, for granting an order of interim injunction
4
qua the usage of name DINAMALAR in the mobile application. At
present, this Court is not inclined to grant any injunction for the
usage of domain name since it appears to be in usage for quite some
time.
4.Accordingly, there shall be an order of