O.A.No.81 of 2023

in C.S.No.552 of 2019

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.

Originally the suit was instituted only against the 1^st and 2^nd

defendants. The allegation of the applicants/ plaintiffs is that the father of

the 1st and 3rd plaintiffs had appointed a watchman, who was given a

small room for purposes of taking care of the property. The said

watchman and his sons and daughters have unlawfully put up

construction in the suit schedule property. Therefore, the present

application is to restrain them from alienating, encumbering and dealing

with the property and also to prevent them from continuing with the

construction.

2.Learned counsel for the applicants invited my attention to the

Will dated 23.09.1980. In particular, he pointed out that the boundaries

of the property are described thereunder and that the said Will dealt with

1060 sq.ft. He also referred to the sale deed dated 14.03.1975 and

pointed out that the said sale deed was restricted to 400 sq.ft.

3.Learned counsel also pointed out that there are two versions of

Page:1/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the death certificate of A.Kannabiran and that th