SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 96989

MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAJASEKARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY – Respondent


Crl A No.352 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.03.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

Crl A No.352 of 2016

Rajasekaran

..Appellant / 1st Accused

Vs.

State by Inspector of Police

All Women Police Station,

Villupuram,

Crime No.58 of 2011

..Respondent /

Complainant

Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 of Cr.PC to set

aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant by the

learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram, (Fast Track Mahila

Court), Villupuram in S.C.No.60 of 2012 dated 26.04.2016.

For Petitioner

: Mr.C.Munusamy

For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran

Government Advocate

[Criminal Side]

1/15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl A No.352 of 2016

O R D E R

When this Criminal Appeal came up for hearing on

24.01.2023, this Court passed the following order :-

This Criminal Appeal has been preferred challenging

the judgement of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track

Mahila Court, Villupuram dated 26.04.2016 made in

SC.No.60 of 2012.

2. The appellant is the first accused against

whom the prosecutrix/PW1 has given a complaint on

the allegation that the first accused gave a love propo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top