2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 96625
MADRAS HIGH COURT
The Secondary to Government, – Appellant
Versus
S.Sundar, Supervisor / D-II, – Respondent
WA 2188 2018
W.A.Nos.2188 and 2230 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
W.A.Nos.2188 and 2230 of 2018
and
C.M.P.Nos.16976 and 17733 of 2018
1.The Secretary to Government,
Housing and Urban Development Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Director,
Town and Country Planning,
No.807, Anna Salai,
Chennai – 02.
...Appellants in both the WAs
Vs.
1.S.Sundar
... 1st respondent in WA.2188/2018
1.M.Sankareswaran
... 1st respondent in WA.2330/2018
2.The Secretary,
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
Frazer Bridge Road,
Chennai – 03.
...2nd Respondent in both WAs
1/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.Nos.2188 and 2230 of 2018
Prayer in both the Writ Appeals
: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of
the Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order dated 27.04.2018 made in
W.P.Nos.30043 and 30045 of 2016 and allow these writ appeals.
For Appellants
: Mr.S.Silambanan,
Additional Advocate General
Assisted by
Mr.Hasan Fizal,
Additional Government Pleader
and Mr.Babu Barveez,
Government Advocate
For Respondents
: Mr.V.Karthic,
Senior Counsel
Assisted by
Mr.S.Haroon AL Rasheed for R1
R2 – No appearance
*********
2/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.Nos.2188 and 2230 of 2018
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)
The State is on appeal challenging the order of the writ Court
made in W.P.Nos.30043 and 30045 of 2016 quashing the departmental
proceeding launched against the petitioners in the said writ petitions for
having collected a lesser amount as Infrastructure and Amenities
Development charges.
2. The concept of Infrastructure and Amenities Development
charges. was first introduced by G.O.Ms.No.191 dated 01.06.2007. The
said Government Order prescribed a maximum and minimum amount of
Infrastructure and Amenities Development charges per square meter and
vested the discretion in the Director of Town and Country Planning and
Vice-Chairman of the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority to fix
the charges in between the maximum and minimum amount. Pursuant
thereto, The Director of Town and Country Planning passed an order dated
01.06.2007 fixing the Infrastructure and Amenities Development charges for
multi-storeyed building at Rs.1000/- per square metre.
3/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.Nos.2188 and 2230 of 2018
3. Subsequently, another Government Order was passed in
G.O.Ms.No.22 dated 26.01.2008, wherein, there were certain modifications
regarding the Infrastructure and Amenities Development charges. The said
Government Order also provided the maximum and minimum rates and
authorised the Director of the Town and Country Planning or the Vice-
Chairman of the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, as the case
may be, to fix the actuyal charges. Pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.22 dated
26.01.2008, the Director of Town and Country Planning fixed Rs.1000/- per
squre meter as Infrastructure and Amenities Development charges payable
for the multi-storeyed buildings.
4. By a subsequent Government Order viz., G.O.Ms.No.161 dated
09.09.2009, the Government reduced the Infrastructure and Amenities
Development charges at Rs.250/- per square meter for multi-storeyed
residential buildings.
4/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.Nos.2188 and 2230 of 2018
5. The respondents herein who were working as Assistant Director
of Town and Country Planning and Supervisor in the Directorate of Town
and Country Planning raised a demand against the builder who had
submitted an application for approval, based on handing over of the Open
Space Reservation (OSR) land to them, which was on 31.10.2009, applied
the last of the three Government Orders viz., G.O.Ms.No.161 dated
09.09.2009 and collected Rs.250/- per square meter as Infrastru