2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 102258
MADRAS HIGH COURT
V.Murthy – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Secretary – Respondent
WP/292/2023
A public interest litigation is not maintainable in service matters.
Headnote:
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION - SERVICE MATTERS - NOT MAINTAINABLE - STRANGER - CANNOT MAINTAIN A PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN SERVICE MATTERS.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition, styled as a public interest litigation, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order made in G.O.No.574, dated 17.10.2020 issued by the second respondent and the G.O.No.108, dated 23.09.2022 issued by the third respondent and quash the same and to further direct the State Government to fill up the above vacancies through the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in accordance with Constitution by conducting an open competition giving equal opportunity to all qualified citizens.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioner, being a stranger, cannot maintain a public interest litigation in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in Duryodhan Sahu v. Jitendra Kumar Mishra, supra.
Issues: Whether a public interest litigation is maintainable in service matters.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Duryodhan Sahu v. Jitendra Kumar Mishra, (1998) 7 SCC 273, which held that a public interest litigation is not maintainable in service matters.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed.
W.P.No.292 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.01.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.292 of 2023
V.Murthy
Founder,
Vanniyakula Shatriyar Matrum Nalivutror Kalvi
Samuga Mempattu Peravai,
3, Sami Street, Muthalamman Koil Complex,
Ranipet-632 401, Ranipet District.
.. Petitioner-in-
Person
Vs
1.The Chief Secretary,
The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Fort St. George, Secretariat,
Chennai-600 009.
2.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government,
Revenue and Disaster Management,
Chief Secretariat,
The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Fort St. George, Secretariat,
Chennai-600 009.
__________
Page 1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.292 of 2023
3.The Principal Secretary to Government,
Co-operation Food and Consumer Protection Dept.,
Chief Secretariat,
The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Fort St. George, Secretariat,
Chennai-600 009.
.. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the
records pertaining to the order made in G.O.No.574/17.10.2020 issued
by the second respondent and the G.O.No.108/23.09.2022 issued by
the third respondent and quash the same and further for a
consequential directions to the State Government to fill up the above
vacancies through the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in
accordance with Constitution by conducting an open competition giving
equal opportunities to all qualified citizens.
For the Petitioner
: No Appearance
For the Respondents
: Mr.R.Shunmugasundaram
Advocate-General
assisted by
Mr.P.Balathandayutham
Spl. Government Pleader
and Ms.Sheena
for respondent Nos.1 to 3
ORDER
(Order of the court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
__________
Page 2 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.292 of 2023
2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition, styled as a public
interest litigation, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified
mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order made in
G.O.No.574, dated 17.10.2020 issued by the second respondent
and the G.O.No.108, dated 23.09.2022 issued by the third
respondent and quash the same and to further direct the State
Government to fill up the above vacancies through the Tamil Nadu
Public Service Commission in accordance with Constitution by
conducting an open competition giving equal opportunity to all
qualified citizens.
3. It is trite law that no public interest litigation shall be
entertained in service matters. In Duryodhan Sahu v. Jitendra
Kumar Mishra, (1998) 7 SCC 273, a Three-Judge Bench of the
Supreme Court held that a public interest litigation is not
maintainable in service matters. It is observed in paragraph (18)
of the judgment supra, as under:
“18. ... If public interest litigations at the instance of
strangers are allowed to be entertained by the
__________
Page 3 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.292 of 2023
Tribunal, the very object of speedy disposal of
service matters would get defeated.’
4. The petitioner, being a stranger, we hold that he cannot
maintain a public interest litigation in the light of the decision of
the Apex Court in Duryodhan Sahu v. Jitendra Kumar Mishra,
supra.
5. The aforesaid view was reiterated by this Court in the order
dated 13.12.2022 passed in W.P.No.33260 of 2022 [A.P.Gowdhama
Sidharthan v. The State of Tamil Nadu], in which the Acting Chief
Justice was a member.
For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is dismissed.
There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.308
and 309 of 2022 are closed.
(T.R., ACJ.) (D.B.C., J.)
09.01.2023