2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 90698
MADRAS HIGH COURT
LOURDUSAMY – Appellant
Versus
MARIYA JOSEPH ALPHONE BLAMPAIN – Respondent
CRP 707 2021
CRP.No.707 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON
: 13.06.2023
PRONOUNCED ON : 01.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
CRP.No.707 of 2021
and
CMP.No.5923 of 2021
Lourdusamy
...Petitioner
Vs.
Mariya Joseph Alphone Blampain,
Rep by his power of attorney,
Jayapragasam, S/o Ramadoss,
No.439, M.G.Road, Puducherry,
Rep by Power of attorney,
Jayapragasam, S/o Ramadoss
No.32, Gangiamman Koil Street,
Chennaiyanpet, Pondicherry.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order dated
05.01.2021 passed in R.C.E.P.No.6 of 2016 in H.R.C.O.P.No.65 of
2013, on the file of Rent Controller-I at Puducherry and dismiss the
same with cost.
1/16
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.No.707 of 2021
For Petitioner
: Mr.D.Senthilkumar
For Respondent
: M/s.R.S.Akila for
M/s.Sudha Ramalingam
ORDER
This petition had been filed by the judgment debtor in RCEP.No.6 of
2016 in HRCOP.No.65 of 2013, on the file of the Rent Controller I
Puducherry.
2.The brief facts which are relevant to decide the CRP are as
follows:-
The petitioner was a tenant in the premises bearing D.No.15, Saint
Ange Street, Puducherry 605 001. The respondent herein filed
HRCOP.No.65 of 2013 under Section 10(2)(i), 10(3)(i) and 14(1)(b) of
Pondicherry Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1969 seeking the
relief of eviction of the respondent before the learned Rent Controller
(Revision Petitioner herein) from the leased out premises for willful default
for demolition of the building as it is dilapidated building and for personal
use of the landlord and also directing the Respondent before the learned
Lease Controller (revision petitioner herein) to pay the arrears of rent for a
2/16
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.No.707 of 2021
sum of Rs.84,000/- at the rate of Rs.3,500/- p.m., for 24 months
commencing from October 2011 till the date of filing of the RCOP.
3.The learned Rent Controller had allowed the petition under petition
in I.A.No.1544 of 2014 in HRCOP.No.65 of 2013, the petition under
Section 11(3) of the Pondicherry Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act,
1969 direction to the Respondent/tenant to pay the arrears of rent totally a
sum of Rs.1,15,000/-. In case of failure of the Respondent to pay the arrears
of rent to further proceed with the main HRCOP.No.65 of 2013.
4.The petition filed by the landlord in I.A.No.1544 of 2014 in
HRCOP.65 of 2013 was allowed and an ex-parte order was passed against
the tenant, the respondent in I.A.No.1544 of 2014 and the respondent in
HRCOP.No.65 of 2013 as per order dated 17.10.2014.
5.Aggrieved by the same, the respondent/tenant had filed petition in
I.A.No.1544 of 2015 in HRCOP.No.65 of 2013 under Section 12 and 13 of
the Pondicherry Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1969 to set aside
3/16
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.No.707 of 2021
the ex-parte order passed against the Respondent/tenant dated 16.09.2014.
The said petition was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the tenant filed
RCA.No.16 of 2018 which was dismissed by the learned Rent Control
Appellate Authority/learned II Additional District Judge, Puducherry in
RCA.No.16 of 2018 by an order dated 11.01.2019.
6.He also submit that the landlord had filed RCEP.No.6 of 2016 in
HRCOP.No.65 of 2013 on the file of the learned Rent Controller-I at
Puducherry. The tenant had filed E.A.No.86 of 2020 in E.P.No.6 of 2016 in
HRCOP.No.65 of 2013 which was dismissed by the learned Rent
Controller -I by an order dated 15.12.2020 and in RCEP.NO.6 of 2016 in
HRCOP.No.65 of 2013 was ordered by an order dated 05.01.2021.
7.Aggrieved by the same, the Respondent/tenant in HRCOP.No.65 of
2013 the tenant in RCEP.No.6 of 2016 had filed this CRP seeking to set
aside the order on the file of the learned Rent