MADRAS HIGH COURT
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
G. SRIDHAR – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
Crl.OP.No.581 of 2023
Crl.OP.No.581 of 2023
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hand of the respondent
police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341,
294(b), 323, 324, 354 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.794 of 2022, seeks
anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that on account of enmity with regard
to keeping of cat in the house, the petitioner along with other accused picked
up a quarrel with the defacto complainant, during the quarrel, the petitioner
along with other accused abused the defacto complainant in a filthy
language and also assaulted her with hands. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that
the petitioner and the defacto complainant are neighbours and due to
previous enmity, he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would
further submit that the co-accused was granted anticipatory bail on
06.01.2023 in Crl.OP.No.227 of 2023. Hence, the learned counsel prays to
grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.581 of 2023
4. The learned Government Advoc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.