2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 93156
MADRAS HIGH COURT
SASIKALA – Appellant
Versus
G.SHIFA – Respondent
CMA 4139 2019
CMA.No.4139 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :19.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.M.A.No.4139 of 2019
1.Sasikala
2.Sasikumari
...Appellants
Vs
1.G.Shifa
2.Bharati General Insurance Co, Ltd.,
2nd Floor Metro Plaza
162, Anna Salai
Chennai 600 002.
..Respondents
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in
MCOP.No.209 of 2015 dated 21.11.2016 on the file of Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal-cum-Special District Judge, Villupuram.
For Appellants
: Ms.M.Selvam
For Respondents
: Mr.S.Arunkumar for R2
J U D G M E N T
This appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking
enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 21.11.2016
1/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA.No.4139 of 2019
passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -cum-Special District Judge,
Villupuram. in MCOP.No.209 of 2015.
2. On 21.10.2014 at about 6.00 a.m., while the deceased was on the
way to her daughter's house on the left side of Chennai to Thiruchy bye-pass
road near Janakipuram bus stop standing there for crossing the road from
east to west, the first respondent's vehicle bearing Regn.No.TN-10-Y-4998,
driven by its driver, in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the
deceased, due to which, the deceased was thrown away and thereby
sustained severe fatal injuries and died on the spot. Claiming that the
deceased was a milk vendor and was earning about Rs.15,000/- per month
and the driver of the car is solely responsible for the accident, the appellants
/ claimants have filed a claim petition before the Tribunal claiming a sum of
Rs.10,00,000/- .
3. The appellants unsatisfied with the quantum of compensation
awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award have preferred this
appeal seeking enhancement.
2/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA.No.4139 of 2019
4. The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the
impugned award are as follows:
Heads
Award Amount
(Rs.)
Loss of Income
2,43,000/-
Loss of love and
affection to appellants
20,000/-
Funeral Expenses
20,000/-
Total
2,83,000/-
After deducting 20% of contributory negligence on the side of the
deceased, total compensation works out to Rs.2,26,400/- (2,83,000 –
56,600/-)
5. Before the Tribunal, the Appellants/claimants examined two
witnesses as PW1 and PW2 and filed eight documents which were marked
as Ex.P1 to Ex.P8. On the side of the Respondents, neither witness was
examined nor document filed.
3/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA.No.4139 of 2019
6. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel
for the second respondent and perused the materials available on record.
7. The learned counsel appearing for the Appellants/Claimants
submitted that the Tribunal has erroneously fixed Rs.4500/- per month as
income of the deceased. It has failed to consider the ratio propounded by
this Court in 2009 (1) TNMAC 249 DB and 2009 (1) TNMAC 556 and
2017 (2) TNMAC 609. It has erred in fixing negligence on the part of the
deceased as 20% without considering the proper evidence. It has erred in
deducting 1/3rd instead of 50%. towards personal expenses. It has not
awarded any amount under the heads of transport expenses, love and
affection and loss of estate. The Tribunal, without appreciating the evidences
properly, has awarded the total compensation of Rs.2,26,400/- and the said
quantum is unreasonable. It has erred in awarding Rs.20,000/- towards loss
of love and affection to the appellants and Rs.20,000/- towards funeral
expenses and the same are very meagre. Hence, he prayed to enhance the
compensation.
4/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA.No.4139 of 2019
8. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent
submitted tha