SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 98408

MADRAS HIGH COURT
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
ARAVINTH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY ITS, – Respondent
CRL OP/2665/2023



Crl.O.P.No. 2665 of 2023

Crl.O.P.No. 2665 of 2023

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial

custody on 27.12.2022 for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148,

302, 149, 120(B), 342, 427, 294(b), 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.542 of

2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, on

25.12.2022 the petitioners along with other accused waylaid deceased viz.,

Dhinesh vehicle and scolded him in filthy language and also attacked him

with wooden log and billhook, thereby the deceased sustained head injuries

and subsequently, he succumbed to injuries. Hence, the complaint was

registered against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no

specific overtact attributed against the petitioner and he is an innocent

person and he has not at all committed any offence as alleged by the

Page 1 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No. 2665 of 2023

respondent police. He would submit that he is no way connected with the

occurrence and he will abide by any condition that may be imposed by this

court. He would further submit that the investigation is almost completed

and that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration from 27.12.2022.

Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for

respondent would submit that totally, there are 8 accused involved in this

case and the petitioner is arrayed as A1. He would submit that due to

previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused attacked deceased,

thereby he succumbed to injuries. He would submit that there are 16

previous cases pending against him, out of which four cases under Sec.307

of I.P.C. and one case under Sec.302 of I.P.C. pending against him and he

is the prime accused in committing the offence. He would submit that all the

accused are arrested and they are in judicial custody. He would submit that

if he is released on bail, he would tamper the witnesses and hamper the

investigation and the investigation is not yet completed. Hence, he

vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

Page 2 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No. 2665 of 2023

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the

submissions made by both counsel and also considering gravity of offence

committed by the petitioner, due to previous enmity, he and other accused

attacked the deceased, who was travelling in a car, thereby he succumbed to

injuries and he is the prime accused in committing the offence and also the

fact that there are 16 previous cases pending against him, out of which four

cases under Sec.307 of I.P.C. and one case under Sec.302 of I.P.C. pending

against him and if he is released on bail, there is possibility of tampering the

witnesses and hampering the investigation, this Court is not inclined to

grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is

dismissed.

06.02.2023

rpp

Page 3 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No. 2665 of 2023

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

rpp

Crl.O.P.No. 2665 of 2023

06.02.2023

Page 4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top