C.R.P.No.1219 of 2021

C.R.P (NPD) No.1219 of 2021

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

Mr.Om Prakash, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the

Revision Petitioner submitted that the learned Sub-Judge, Tambaram, had

returned the plaint several times raising many queries. Subsequently, it was

complied with by the learned Counsel before the trial Court. After several

returns and compliances, the same was taken on file and the suit was

numbered. After issuance of summons to the Defendant, the Defendant

entered appearance and filed a written statement.

2. It is the contention of the learned Senior Counsel for the

Petitioner that the Plaintiff had purchased the property from the Defendant,

an extent of 175 Sq.ft. Subsequently on measuring by the Firka Surveyor, it

was found that it was not as per FMB Sketch. Therefore, he sought another

property marked as Schedule 'D' in the sketch attached in the typed set. In

the meanwhile, the Defendant, who had sold the property, was staying at the

first floor of the building as a permissive occupier. The learned Senior

Counsel invited the attention of this Court to the prayer in the plaint seeking

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/jud