SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 98533

MADRAS HIGH COURT
T.M.SUBRAMANIYAM AND CO – Appellant
Versus
ARAPPOR IYAKKAM – Respondent
CS 136 2019



Headnote:

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff, M/s.T.M.Subramaniyam & Co, filed a civil suit against the defendants, M/s.Arapoor Iyakkam and Jayaram Venkatesan, seeking damages and compensation for defamation, and a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from making defamatory statements against the plaintiff.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the civil suit as withdrawn, with no costs.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the civil suit as withdrawn, with no costs.

C.S.No.136 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 15.12.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

C.S.No.136 of 2019

M/s.T.M.Subramaniyam & Co

Rep by its Partner

T.S.S.Sharan Kumar

No.14/1, Manjolai Street

Kalaimagal Nagar

Ekkaduthangal, Chennai – 600 032

.. Plaintiff

Versus

1.M/s.Arapoor Iyakkam

Rep by its Convener

2.Jayaram Venkatesan

.. Defendants

Prayer : Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read

with Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to pass a judgment

and decree to :

a) directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay the sum of

Rs.1,00,01,000/- (Rupees One Crore and One Thousand only)

Page 1 / 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.No.136 of 2019

towards the damages and compensation to the plaintiff;

b) for permanent injunction, restraining the defendants and their men

and agents from in any manner, holding any press meet, releasing or

distributing any statement to the print and electronic media or to

anyone against the plaintiff and its business imputing the character or

insinuating the reputation or linking the name of the plaintiff with an

person or defaming the name of the plaintiff in any manner;

c) to direct the defendants to pay costs of this suit

For Plaintiff

: Mr.D.Rajkumar

For Defendants

: Ms.D.Nagasaila for D1

Mrs.Sudha Ramalingam for D2

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks permission of this

Court to withdraw the Civil Suit and he has also made an endorsement to

that effect.

Page 2 / 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.No.136 of 2019

2. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the

plaintiff and the endorsement so made, this Civil Suit is dismissed as

withdrawn. No costs. Registry is directed to return the Court Fee if

permitted, as per the rules.

15.12.2023

dhk

Internet : Yes

Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non Speaking order

Page 3 / 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.No.136 of 2019

N. SATHISH KUMAR

, J.

dhk

C.S.No.136 of 2019

15.12.2023

Page 4 / 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top