SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 43334

MADRAS HIGH COURT
A.SENGOTTAIYAN(Died) – Appellant
Versus
P.MANI – Respondent


ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner as against the order passed in I.A.No.123 of 2002 in A.S.No.91 of 2001 dated 18.02.2002, wherein the petitioner has filed a petition under Order 41 Rule 27 and the same was dismissed by the Appellate Court along with the main appeal. Hence, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner.

2. The petitioner is the second respondent in the First Appeal. The suit has been filed for relief of specific performance of contract. According to the plaintiff, the suit property is the sale property of the first defendant. According to the second respondent, the first respondent acquired some properties through partition between the brothers of first respondent and at the time a sum of Rs.500/- was given to the first respondent for ovelty.

3.The first defendant purchased the property through the said amount of Rs.500/- and thereby the property is an ancestral property and the son of the first defendant also share holders of the property. In order to support the second respondent contention the partition deed, dated 06.06.1955 have to be marked and thereby filed an application to receive the documents. Due to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top