MADRAS HIGH COURT
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
L.RAVI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
CRL OP/1410/2023
Crl.OP.No.1410 of 2023
Crl.OP.No.1410 of 2023
T.V.THAMILSELVI
The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
20.09.2022 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 8(c) read
with 20(b), 27(A), 28 and 29 of the NDPS Act @ under Section 8(c) read
with 20(b)(ii)(C), 27(A), 28 and 29 of the NDPS Act 1985, in NCB
F.No.48/1/12/2019-NCB/MDS in C.C.No.39 of 2020, on the file of the
respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 20.09.2019, based on secret
information, the petitioner along with other accused were found to be in
illegal possession of 303.250 kgs of ganja. All of them are arrested and
remanded to judicial custody. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is
an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the
prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further
submits that he already moved an application for bail before the Principal
Court under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai and the same was dismissed on
05.01.2023 in Crl.MP.No.5956 of 2022. He also submitted that the
petitioner is in custody from 20.09.2022, and hence, he prays to grant bail to
the petitioner.
1/2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1410 of 2023
T.V.THAMILSELVI
drl
4. The learned Special Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner
along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 303.250 kgs of
ganja and it is a commercial quantity. He further submits that 14 packets of
ganja was received, which was possessed by the petitioner and it is weighed
about 28.300 kgs which comes under commercial quantity. He further
submits that if the petitioner on bail at this stage when the investigation is
pending,will provide the petitioner with an opportunity to abscond as well
as tamper with the evidences in this case. Hence, he vehemently opposed to
grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case
and the submission made by the learned counsel and also considering the
fact that the alleged contraband is a commercial quantity and the petitioner
did not satisfy the conditions required under Section 37 of NDPS Act for
grant of bail, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
08.02.2023
drl
Crl.OP.No.1410 of 2023
2/2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.