SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 10969

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL
S.Ilayaraja – Appellant
Versus
Nandhni Devi – Respondent


ORDER

This petition is filed to quash the attachment order passed in Crl.M.P.No.

173 of 2014 dated 20.01.2020 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli.

2.According to the petitioner, the respondents filed maintenance case as against the petitioner and the trial Court awarded a sum of Rs.2,000/- each to the respondents. The allegations made by the first respondent are that due to the harassment made by the petitioner, the first respondent left the matrimonial home and residing with her parents. Thereafter, the first respondent filed an application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Trichy. Thereafter the trial Court has passed an order to pay maintenance of Rs.2,000/- to each respondents through an order dated 07.11.2012. Against which, the petitioner preferred a criminal revision in Criminal Revision No.11 of 2013 before the I Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli and the said order was confirmed by the appellate Court through order dated 07.08.2013. The petitioner has not challenged the said order. Now the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli in Cr.M.P.No.173 of 2014 passed attachment order by attaching the salary of the petitioner. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top