SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 2710

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
Manoharan – Appellant
Versus
Dilli – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The plaintiff, who has unsuccessfully contested the suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendants/respondents, is the appellant before this Court.

2. The facts of the case are set out hereinbelow and the parties are referred to in the same rank as before the Trial Court.

FACTS OF THE CASE:

2.1. It is the case of the plaintiff that he is the grandson of one

Govinda Nayudu who is a native of Pudukuppam. The said Govinda Nayudu was the son of Venkatasamy Nayudu and his brothers were Rajavelu Nayudu alias Rajulu Nayudu and Chinnappa Nayudu. Govinda Nayudu had three sons viz., Nadhamuni Nayudu, Sundara Nayudu and Rathina Nayudu. Nadhamuni Nayudu, in turn, had only one son viz., Kannaya Nayudu whose only son was Bakthavachalam Nayudu. Bakthavachalam Nayudu died soon after his marriage and his wife got some properties after his demise. Nadhamuni Nayudu also had daughters and his eldest daughter was one Saroja, whose sons are the defendants in the suit. They were brought up by Kannaya Nayudu after the death of his son Bakthavachalam Nayudu. The other daughters of Kannaya Nayudu were married and living with their respective in-laws. Sundara Nayudu died as a bache

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top