SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 25393

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
SHIVANI BALARAM – Appellant
Versus
APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.207 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent filed a private complaint and the same has been taken cognizance by the Trial Court in C.C.No.207 of 2017 for the offence under Section 28(1) of the Pre-conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act 1994 and Pre-conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Rules 1996 and for the offences under Section 3B, 18(1), (5) and Rule 3A (1) of PCPNDT Act Rules 1996 punishable under Sections 23(1) of the Pre-conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act (Central Act) No.57 of 1994.

4. The crux of the complaint is that on 27.12.2016, the respondent, along with Joint Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Cuddalore, State Inspection team members and Sub District Appropriate Authority, Kurinjipadi, had inspected the private pharmacy, viz., Sun Pharmacy, s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top