2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 44081
MADRAS HIGH COURT
SUBASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent
CRL A 631 2021
Crl.A.No.631 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 06.01.2023
PRONOUNCED ON : 24.02.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
Crl.A.No.631 of 2021
Subash
... Appellant
Vs.
State rep. by
Inspector of Police,
Malayampalayam Police Station,
Crime No.43 of 2019
... Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. to set-
aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant by the judgment
dated 09.11.2021 passed in Special S.c.No.30 of 2019 on the file of Fast
Track (Sessions Judge), Mahila Judge, Erode by allowing the present
Criminal Appeal.
1 of 16
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.631 of 2021
For Appellant
: Mr. K. Ehirajulu,
Legal Aid Counsel.
For Respondent
: Mr. C.E.Pratap,
Government Advocate (crl.side)
O R D E R
Challenging the conviction and sentence passed by the learned
Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Erode in Spl.S.C.No.30 of 2019,
dated 31.03.2022, the present Criminal Appeal has been filed.
2. The fact of the case is that on 09.03.2019, at 215 p.m., while the
defacto complainant and his wife were cleaning the ducks at the backyard of
the shop,namely Ruchi, the accused asked water with the victim child.
When the victim child went to take water, the accused went behind her and
closed her mouth with his hand, kissed her lips and touched her vagina. On
heating the voice of the victim child, the defacto complainant and his wife
came to the spot, where, they found the accused was touching the child's
2 of 16
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.631 of 2021
vagina. Hence, the defacto complainant, who is father of the victim child
lodged the complaint and the case has been registered in Crime No.3 of
2019 under Section 9(m) r/w. 10 of Protection of Children from Sexual
Offences Act, 2012. and after investigation, final report has been filed.
3. Based on the above materials, the Trial Court framed charges as
against the accused under Section 9(m) r/w. 10 of Protection of Children
from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the accused denied the same as false.
In order to prove the case of prosecution, as many as 13 witnesses were
examined, 15 documents were marked.
4. When the incriminating materials were put to the accused under
Section 313 Cr.P.C., he denied the same as false, he did not choose to
examine any witness nor mark any documents.
3 of 16
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.631 of 2021
5. Having considered all the materials, the Trial Court convicted the
accused under Section 9(m) r/w. 10 of Protection of Children from Sexual
Offences Act, 2012, the relevant portion of the sentence is as follows:-
" 19. Finally the accused found guilty under Section 9(m)
punishable u/s.10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual
Offences act, 2012 and I convict the accused u/s.9(m)
punishable u/s. 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual
Offences Act, 2012 and sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for 5 years and fine Rs.1000/-and in default to
undergo 2 months simple imprisonment. (fine amount
Rs.1000/-)
20. I further ordered that the period of detention
already undergone by the accused is to be set off u/s.428 of
Cr.P.C.,
21. This Court hereby recommends to the State
Government of Tamil Nadu to compensate a sum of
Rs.50,000/- to the victim child who suffered by physical and
mental injury caused to her due to the result of the offence
4 of 16
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.631 of 2021
and for execution the same the copy of this judgment is
forwarded to the District Child Welfare Officer, D.No.69
Gandhiji Road, Jawan Bhavan Building, Erode the
compensation amount may be paid to the child victim within
one month from the date of the judgment. The amount of
Rs.25,000/- is ordered to the child victim in Crl.
M.P.No.271/19