2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 94234
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
Murugannan Janarthanam – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Limited, – Respondent
WP/2557/2021
W.P.No.2557 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.02.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. V. KARTHIKEYAN
Writ Petition No.2557 of 2021
and
Writ Miscellaneous Petition No.2899 of 2021
and
Writ Miscellaneous Petition No.30996 of 2022
Murugannan Janarthanam
... Petitioner
Versus
1. Indian Oil Corporation Limited,
Rep by its Chief Executive Officer,
Indian Oil Bhawan,
G-9, All Yavar Jung Marg,
Bandra (East)
Mumbai-400 051.
2. The General Manager,
The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,
(Regional Office) Chennai,
Indian Oil Bhavan, Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 034.
3. The Divisional Manager,
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,
Chennai Divisional Office,
500, Anna Salai, Teynampet,
Chennai – 600 018.
4. Sankar Annamalai
... Respondents
(R4 impleaded vide order dated 22.08.2022
made in WMP No.16540/022)
1/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.2557 of 2021
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the
records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent vide
his letter in Ref.SRMP 18/380/LOI Cancellation dated 06.01.2021 and
quash the same as illegal and consequently, to direct the 2nd respondent to
process forthwith the petitioner's application No.15457158064365 dated
25.12.2018 for award of Petroleum Retail Outlet Dealership at
Vandavasi-Mambattu (on SH-115) Tiruvannamalai District.
For Petitioner
: Mr. K. P. S. Palanivel Rajan
For R1 to R3
: Mr. V. Anantha Natarajan, (IOCL)
For R5
: Mr. J. Muthukumaran
ORDER
The Writ Petition has been filed by Murugannan Janarthanan, in
the nature of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, seeking records relating
to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent, the General Manager,
Indian Oil Corporation Limited at Nungambakkam in Chennai, in Letter
No.Ref.SRMP18/380/LOI, dated 06.01.2021 whereby, the 2nd
respondent had cancelled the letter of indent given to the petitioner
herein and to further process the application of the petitioner bearing
2/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.2557 of 2021
No.15457158064365, dated 25.12.2018, for grant of Petroleum Retail
Outlet Dealership at Vandavasi – Mampattu SH 115, Tiruvannamalai
District.
2. The petitioner had applied for dealership of the aforementioned
Petroleum Retail Outlet at Vandavasi – Mampattu SH 115. He was
declared as a successful candidate after process of selection by the 2nd
respondent herein. Thereafter there was an obligations on the petitioner
to produce relevant documents.
3. The petitioner claims that he had produced the relevant
documents. However, on perusal of the documents, raising various
issues, the 2nd respondent by the impugned order dated 06.01.2020, had
cancelled the letter of indent given to the petitioner herein.
4. This had given necessity to file the present Writ Petition.
5. The next candidate who would be then automatically selected
would be Sankar Annamalai, who had filed W.M.P.No.30996/2022.
3/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.2557 of 2021
6. Necessity for filing such miscellaneous application, was owing
to the fact that earlier the Writ Petitioner had the benefit of an interim
Stay. Owing to that grant of stay, the 2nd respondent had not moved
forward to grant the letter of indent in favour of the petitioner in
W.M.P.No.30996/2022.
7. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the 2nd respondent
had practically entered into a discussion on the documents which had
been presented by the petitioner herein. He examined the Schedule of
properties in the Lease Deed, dated 24.12.2018 and thereafter, examined
the Rectification Deed, which was registered on 25.11.2019, with respect
to the Clauses in the original Lease Deed, dated 24.12.2018 and also
examine further in the Rectification deed, dated 28.09.2020, for
correcting the Schedule of the original Lease Deed.
8. Thereafter,