MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
E.Gowri – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
WP/4111/2023
W.P.No.4111 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.02.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Writ Petition No.4111 of 2023
E.Gowri
..
Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector
District Collectorate
Vengikkal
Tiruvannamalai 606 604.
2. The District Revenue Officer
District Revenue Office
District Collectorate
Vengikkal
Tiruvannamalai 606 604.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Revenue Divisional Office
Arani
Tiruvannamalai 632 301.
4. The Tahsildar
Taluk Office
Kalasapakkam
Tiruvannamalai District 606 751.
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.4111 of 2023
5. Selvi
6. Subbarayan
7. Baskaran
..
Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein
to take necessary action on the petitioner representation dated
10.01.2023 and direct the respondents 1 to 4 herein to remove
obstruction made by the respondents 5 and 7 and there are
encroached the government land and requesting to demolish the
construction.
For the Petitioner
: Mr.K.Gangadaran
For the Respondents
: Mr.J.Ravindran
Additional Advocate General
Assisted by
Mr.A.Selvendran
Special Government Pleader
for Respondents 1, 2 & 4
Mr.P.Muthukumar
State Government Pleader
for Respondent-3
ORDER
(Made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the
respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action on the representation of
Page 2 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.4111 of 2023
the petitioner dated 10.01.2023 for removing the alleged
encroachment made by the respondents 5 to 7.
2. The petitioner is residing in Road Street, Kaladi Village,
Kalasapakkam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. According to her, the
respondents 5 to 7 have encroached five feet, out of 15 feet of the
Government road side poramboke land and therefore, she made a
detailed representation to the official respondents on 22.11.2022 and
thereafter, another representation on 10.01.2023. As no action has
been taken on the said representations, the petitioner has come up
with this writ petition.
3. A perusal of the copy of the representations discloses that the
petitioner herself has occupied the poramboke land. Further, the said
representations do not throw any light as to the alleged road side
encroachment made by the respondents 5 to 7 causing nuisance to
the public or waterbody.
4. In view of the above, we do not find any merit nor justification
Page 3 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.4111 of 2023
to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is
dismissed. However, it is made clear that if there is any encroachment,
the same shall be removed by the official respondents. There will be
no order as to costs.
(T.R., ACJ.) (D.B.C., J.)
13.02.2023
Index
: Yes/No
Neutral Citation
: Yes/No
kpl
To
1. The District Collector
District Collectorate
Vengikkal
Tiruvannamalai 606 604.
2. The District Revenue Officer
District Revenue Office
District Collectorate
Vengikkal
Tiruvannamalai 606 604.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Revenue Divisional Office
Arani, Tiruvannamalai 632 301.
4. The Tahsildar
Taluk Office
Kalasapakkam
Tiruvannamalai District 606 751.
Page 4 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.4111 of 2023
T.RAJA, ACJ,
and
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J
(kpl)
W.P.No.4111 of 2023
13.02.2023
Page 5 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.