2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 91801
MADRAS HIGH COURT
The Branch Manager – Appellant
Versus
Govindan – Respondent
CMA 1128 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 01.08.2023
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN
C.M.A.Nos.1128, 1461 & 1622 of 2022
and C.M.P.Nos.8288, 13525, 10799 & 12056 of 2022
C.M.A.No.1128 of 2022:
The Branch Manager,
M/s.Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Puducherry.
...Appellant
Versus
1.Govindan
2.Santhi
3.Poongothai
4.Thamizhselvi
5.Mr.Siva Mahesh
...Respondents
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated
29.11.2021 passed in M.C.O.P.No.575 of 2018 by the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, IInd Additional District Court, Puducherry.
For Appellant
:
Mrs.C.Bhuvanasundari
For Respondents – 1 to 4
:
Mr.R.Sreedhar
For Respondent – 5
:
No Appearance
1/21
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.1461 of 2022:
The Branch Manager,
M/s.Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Puducherry.
...Appellant
Versus
1.Mrs.Jahuran Bibi
2.Minor Raju Khan
Rep. by his mother Mrs.Jahuran Bibi
3.Mr.Siva Mahesh
...Respondents
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated
29.11.2021 passed in M.C.O.P.No.1004 of 2018 by the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, IInd Additional District Court, Puducherry.
For Appellant
:
Mrs.C.Bhuvanasundari
For Respondents – 1 & 2
:
Mr.V.Iyyappan
For Respondent – 3
:
No Appearance
C.M.A.No.1622 of 2022:
The Branch Manager,
M/s.Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Puducherry.
...Appellant
Versus
1.Mr.Safir Khan
2.Mrs.Ashama Bibi
3.Ms.Asmina Bibi
2/21
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4.Mr.Saifudin Khan
5.Mr.Siva Mahesh
...Respondents
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated
29.11.2021 passed in M.C.O.P.No.1002 of 2018 by the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, IInd Additional District Court, Puducherry.
For Appellant
:
Mrs.C.Bhuvanasundari
For Respondents – 1 to 4
:
Mr.V.Iyyappan
For Respondent – 5
:
No Appearance
COMMON JUDGMENT
All these appeals arise out of a same accident and hence, the same are
disposed of by this common judgment.
2. These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals have been preferred by the
appellant/Insurance Company seeking to set aside the judgment and decree
dated 29.11.2021 passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Puducherry in M.C.O.P.Nos.575, 1004 & 1002
of 2018 respectively.
3/21
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. The brief facts leading to the filing of these appeals are as follows:
On 13.05.2018, at about 2.45 a.m., while one Manikandan was riding
a Suzuki motorcycle bearing Registration No.PY 05 W 3960 along with two
pillion riders viz., Ramjan Ali & Azaruddin Khan on Pondy – Villupuram
Main Road, near Appasamy Company, Vadamangalam, Puducherry from
west to east direction, a TATA Multi Axle Goods vehicle bearing
Registration No.TN 20 BJ 6939 driven by its driver coming on the same
road from east to west direction, hit the said motorcycle, as a result of
which, the said Manikandan and two pillion riders were thrown away from
the motorcycle and fell down on the road. In the accident, the said
Manikandan and the two pillion riders who travelled along with him had
sustained severe injuries. One of the pillion riders viz., Azaruddin Khan
died on the spot. Immediately after the accident, the said Manikandan and
another pillion rider viz., Ramzan Ali were taken to JIPMER Hospital,
Puducherry for treatment. However, the another pillion rider viz., Ramzan
Ali died on the way to Hospital. Thereafter, on the very same day of
accident, the said Manikandan died at 4.52 a.m. Hence, the claimants filed
claim petitions claiming compensation.
4/21
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4. The appellant/Insurance Company had filed its separate counter
statement denying all the averments made by the claimants