2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 98315
MADRAS HIGH COURT
MINOR.T.PRAGATHEESWARAN – Appellant
Versus
S.JAYANTHI – Respondent
CMA 365 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 15.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKA RAMAN
C.M.A.No.365 of 2023
Minor T.Pragatheeswaran
Son of Tamilarasan,
Rep.by Guardian/Father Tamilarasan ...Appellant
Vs.
1.S.Jayanthi
2.The Branch Manager,
The New India Assurance Company Ltd.,
No.56, T.S.R.Big street,
City Centre Complex, 1st Floor,
Kumbakonam Taluk & Town,
Thanjavur District.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988 against the decree and judgment dated 13.10.2021
made in M.C.O.P.No.180 of 2020, on the file of the Motor Accidents
Claims Tribunal, (Chief Judicial Magistrate),Nagapattinam.
For Appellant
: Mr.Ma.P.Thangavel
For Mr.M.Lokesh
For R2
: Mr.S.Salomi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
J U D G M E N T
The appellant is the claimant in M.C.O.P.No.180 of 2020, on
the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Chief Judicial Magistrate
Court at Nagapattinam. He has filed the above said claim petition under
Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of
Rs.6,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a road accident that
took place on 15.01.2020.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter
referred to as per their ranking before the claims tribunal.
3. The factum of the accident, manner of the accident, rash and
negligence on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle are not
disputed and hence, the findings rendered by the Claims Tribunal, are
confirmed.
4. During the trial, the claim petitioner examined himself as
P.W.1 and marked Exs.P1 to P6. Ex.C1, Disability Certificate issued to the
petitioner by the Regional Medical Board is also marked. On the side of
the respondents, no oral or documentary evidence has been let in.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3
5. After going through the oral and documentary evidence
adduced before the Court, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.2,55,500/-
as compensation together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum
and directed the second respondent to pay the said compensation to the
appellant/claimant. Not satisfied with the quantum of compensation
awarded by the Tribunal, the claimant has filed the present appeal under
Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for seeking enhancement of
compensation.
6. After hearing both sides and taking note of the fact that the
medical board has fixed disability at the rate of 30% and the tribunal has
considered the disability of 30% and awarded a sum of Rs.3,000/- per 1%
to the extent of Rs.90,000/-. Taking into consideration the date of the
accident, I find that it is just and reasonable to award a sum of
Rs.5,000/- per 1% of disability which is hereby enhanced to
Rs.1,50,000/-.
7. Since the appellant/claimant was admitted as an in-patient
from 15.01.2020 to 20.01.2020 in two different hospitals, a sum of
Rs.5,000/- and Rs.6,000/- granted by the Tribunal under the heads
Transportation and loss of amenities is hereby enhanced to Rs.10,000/-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4
and Rs.10,000/- respectively.
8. A sum of Rs.92,500/- granted by the Tribunal under the
head 'Medical Expenses' as per Ex.P6 and the compensation awarded
towards other heads are just and proper and the same are hereby
confirmed.
9. Accordingly, the award of the Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.180 of
2020 is modified as follows:-
Sl.
No
Head
Amout
awarded by
the Tribunal
Amout
awarded by
this Court
Enhanced/
Reduced
1.
Permanent disability (30%)
Rs. 90,000/-
Rs.1,50,000/-
Enhanced
2. Medical Bills (Ex.P6 series)
Rs. 92,500/-
Rs. 92,500/-
Confirmed
3.
Pain & Suffering
Rs. 25,000/-
Rs. 25,000/-
Confirmed
4.
Extra nourishment
Rs. 20,000/-
Rs. 20,000/-
Confirmed
5.
Transport Expenses
Rs. 5,000/-
Rs. 10,000/-
Enhanced
6.
Loss of ment