MADRAS HIGH COURT
SARAVANAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STAT REP.BY – Respondent
CRL OP/1113/2023
Crl.O.P.No.1113 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.1113 of 2023
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the
respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 9 of the
Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, Sections 5(l), 5(j)(ii) read with
Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, in Crime No.23 of 2022, seeks
anticipatory bail.
2. The case of prosecution is that on 12.06.2022 the parents of
the petitioner and the minor victim girl performed child marriage for the
petitioner with the victim minor girl and thereafter in the matrimonial
home, the girl got conceived. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted
that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any
offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1113 of 2023
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
appearing for the respondent would submit that on 12.06.2022 the
parents of the petitioner and the victim minor girl performed child
marriage for the petitioner with the victim minor girl and the girl got
conceived. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to
the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the
submissions made by the learned counsel, this court is inclined to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail
in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days
from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned
Mahila Court, Tiruppur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a
bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two
sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or
the police officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the
Page 2 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1113 of 2023
learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory
bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix
their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the
surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of
their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their
identity.
(b) the petitioner shall report before the
respondent police station every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m.,
for a period of eight weeks and thereafter as and when
required for interrogation.
(c)the petitioner shall file an undertaking
affidavit that he will take care of his wife and child before
the concerned Magistrate.
(d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence
or witness either during investigation or trial;
(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during
investigation or trial;
(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions,
the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take
appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with
law as if the conditions have been imposed and the
petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial
Page 3 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1113 of 2023
Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];
and;
(g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh
FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;
jai
19.01.2023
Page 4 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1113 of 2023
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
jai
Crl.O.P.No.1113 of 2023
19.01.2023
Page 5 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.