MADRAS HIGH COURT
2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 11.01.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH WP.No.11342
11342
ELECTRICITY - SERVICE CONNECTION - DENIAL - ARREARS - REGULATION 17(9) OF THE TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CODE - APPLICABILITY
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash the proceedings issued by the Executive Engineer (Operation and Maintenance), Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation/R1 dated 09.04.2014 and a consequential direction to the respondents to give electricity service connection to the premises at No.169/2, 169/3 and 169/4, Samiappa Nagar, Seelanaickenpatti, Salem (property/property in question) comprised in S.Nos.95/3B and 95/5, T.S.No.93 (Part) pursuant to her application dated 03.03.2014. The petitioner's husband had filed a writ petition in WP.No.13026 of 2013 challenging an order passed by the 2nd respondent in that writ petition being the Executive Engineer (Operation and Maintenance), Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation rejecting his application for three phase electricity service connection to the same property in respect of which the present impugned proceedings have been issued. That writ petition was dismissed by an order of this Court dated 28.08.2018, stating that the order dated 23.04.2013, rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner to provide three phase Electricity Service connection to the petitioners property situated at S.No.95/3B in D.No.169/2, 169/3, 169/4, Samiappa Nagar, Seelinaickenpatti, Salem is under challenge in this writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the impugned order was passed in accordance with Regulation 17(9) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code and that there was no infirmity in the order. The court also noted that the petitioner had not denied the factum of substantial arrears of a sum of Rs.22.55 (approx. crores) to the electricity board.
Issues: Whether the impugned order was passed in accordance with Regulation 17(9) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code?
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the impugned order was passed in accordance with Regulation 17(9) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code and that there was no infirmity in the order. The court also noted that the petitioner had not denied the factum of substantial arrears of a sum of Rs.22.55 (approx. crores) to the electricity board.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed.
WP.No.11342 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 11.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
WP.No.11342 of 2014 and
MP.Nos.2 & 3 of 2014
Sivagami
... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Executive Engineer,
(Operation and Maintenance),
Salem Town Section,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and
Distribution Corporation,
Salem – 636 001.
2.The Assistant Engineer,
Gugai Section,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and
Distribution Corporation,
Salem – 636 006.
3.M/s.Annamalai Cotton Mills (P) Ltd.,
Rep. by its Director Mr.Raja Ganesan,
S/o Perumalchetty Sundaram,
Gajjenaickenpatti,
Salem – 636 201.
... Respondents
(R3 cause title amended vide order dated 16.12.2022
made in WP.No.11342 of 2014 by this Court)
1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP.No.11342 of 2014
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to
issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to proceedings
issued by the 1st Respondent in Ka.No.Se.Po/E&Pa/Na/Se/varai/Ko.L.Cell/No.010/14-
15 dated 09.04.2014 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to
give electricity service connection to the premises of the Petitioner situate at No.169/2,
169/3 & 169/4, Samiappa Nagar, Seelanaickenpatti, Salem-636 201, comprised in
S.No.95/3B and 95/5, T.S.No.93 (Part), on the application dated 03.03.2014 submitted
by the Petitioner, within the period stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner
: Mr.J.Umaid Gothi
for Mr.N.C.Ashok Kumar
For Respondents
: Mr.I.Syed Sibghatulla ((for R1 & R2)
Standing Counsel
O R D E R
The petitioner has sought the relief of quash of proceedings issued by the
Executive Engineer (Operation and Maintenance), Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation
and Distribution Corporation/R1 dated 09.04.2014 and a consequential direction to the
respondents to give electricity service connection to the premises at No.169/2, 169/3
and 169/4, Samiappa Nagar, Seelanaickenpatti, Salem (property/property in question)
comprised in S.Nos.95/3B and 95/5, T.S.No.93 (Part) pursuant to her application dated
03.03.2014.
2.This writ petition has been filed in 2014 and it is seen that the husband of the
petitioner, one V.Venkatachalapathy, had filed a writ petition in WP.No.13026 of 2013
2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP.No.11342 of 2014
challenging an order passed by the 2nd respondent in that writ petition being the
Executive Engineer (Operation and Maintenance), Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation
and Distribution Corporation rejecting his application for three phase electricity service
connection to the same property in respect of which the present impugned proceedings
have been issued.
3.Thus, both the present petitioner and her husband have made applications
almost simultaneously for grant of electricity service connection in respect of the same
property. That writ petition was dismissed by an order of this Court dated 28.08.2018,
stating as follows:
‘The order dated 23.04.2013, rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner
to provide three phase Electricity Service connection to the petitioners
property situated at S.No.95/3B in D.No.169/2, 169/3, 169/4, Samiappa
Nagar, Seelinaickenpatti, Salem is under challenge in this writ petition.
2.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner
states that the writ petitioner is the absolute owner of the property, which is
described in the present writ petition. The writ petitioner submitted an
application to provide service connection in the said premises stated above.
However, the application submitted by the writ petitioner has been rejected
by the respondents in proceedings dated 23.04.2013, stating that in respect
of payment of arrears of consumption charges and theft of energy,
amounting to Rs.22,55,45,744/- (Rupees Twenty Two Crores, Fifty Five
Lakhs, Forty Five Thousand, Seven Hundred and F
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.