SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18717

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL
Sebastian – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent


ORDER

This petition is filed to quash the charge sheet in PRC No.10 of 2000, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi.

2.According to the petitioner, based on the complaint given by the second respondent, the first respondent registered FIR in Crime No.181 of 1993 on the file of the first respondent dated 13.02.1993 for the offence under Sections 3(1)(X) and 3(1)(XI) of the SC/ST Act (Prevention of Atrocities Act).

3.According to the prosecution case, the petitioner was arrayed as A1.

Since the petitioner was not appeared before the trial Court, the case against the petitioner was split up. On 12.02.1993, at about 06.30 a.m., when the second respondent returned from tea stall, the petitioner herein and one Rajaiya came there and abused the caste name and filthy language and attacked him with their footwear. When the same was questioned by the second respondent, again the petitioner assaulted him and his mother.

Therefore, the aforesaid FIR has been registered.

4.In fact the petitioner is innocent and no way connected with the offence. Due to wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the second respondent with regard to payment of agricultural coolie, false complaint has bee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top