SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 43230

MADRAS HIGH COURT
R. SHANMUGAM S/O. RAMASAMY – Appellant
Versus
CHINNAKANNU – Respondent


AS.No.1001 of 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 18.12.2023

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

AS.No.1001 of 2009 and

MP.No.1 of 2009

R.Shanmugam

... Appellant

Vs.

1.Chinnakannu

2.Nagarajan

3.Rajendran

4.Murugan

5.Venkatachalam

6.S.P.Thiyagarajan

7.Sathiyamoorthi

8.T.Easwarn

9.S.Chandrasekaran

...Respondents

PRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of CPC against the judgment

and decree dated 27.07.2009 in OS.No.65 of 2008 on the file of the Additional

District Judge(Fast Track Court-I), Salem.

1/14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

AS.No.1001 of 2009

For Appellant : Mr.K.A.Ravindran

For Respondents

For R1 to 5, 8, 9 : Notice served

For R6 & 7

: Mr.P.Jagadeesan

JUDGMENT

This Appeal suit is filed against the judgment and decree dated

27.07.2009 passed in OS.No.65 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District

Judge(Fast Track Court-I), Salem, thereby dismissed the suit for specific

performance and also refund of excess amount.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their

ranking in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top