SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 43771

MADRAS HIGH COURT
D.SELVAM – Appellant
Versus
K.VIDUVBALAN – Respondent
CRP 3973 2023



Amendment of plaint and filing of additional documents is permissible even after the commencement of trial if it is necessary for the effective adjudication of the dispute and does not change the nature of the suit.

Headnote:

AMENDMENT OF PLAINT - ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS - [Order 6 Rule 17 CPC] - [Order 13 Rule 2 CPC] - [Order 6 Rule 17 CPC] - [Order 13 Rule 2 CPC] - Amendment of plaint and filing of additional documents allowed as trial not commenced and necessary for effective adjudication.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a suit in 2016. After 7 years, the petitioner filed applications seeking to amend the plaint and file additional documents. The trial court dismissed the applications on the ground that they were not maintainable after such a long delay and after the commencement of the trial. The petitioner filed civil revision petitions challenging this order.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court allowed the civil revision petitions and set aside the trial court's order. The court held that the trial had not yet commenced and that the amendment and additional documents were necessary for the effective adjudication of the dispute. The court also noted that the amendment did not change the nature of the suit.

Issues: Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the applications for amendment of plaint and filing of additional documents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Order 6 Rule 17 CPC and Order 13 Rule 2 CPC to hold that the amendment of plaint and filing of additional documents was permissible as the trial had not yet commenced and the documents were necessary for the effective adjudication of the dispute.

Final Decision: The High Court allowed the civil revision petitions and set aside the trial court's order. The court allowed the amendment of plaint and filing of additional documents.

CRP Nos.3973 & 3974 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.12.2023

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V. THAMILSELVI

Civil Revision Petition Nos.3973 & 3974 of 2023

and

C.M.P.Nos.24392 & 24397 of 2023

D.Selvam

S/o.Doss

... Petitioner in both revisions

Vs.

1.K.Vidubalan

S/o.Krishnan

2.K.Muthuramalingam

S/o.Krishnan

...Respondents in both revisions

Common Prayer : Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of

Constitution of India, against the order dated 27.09.2023 passed in

I.A.No.5 of 2023 in O.S.No.5962 of 2016 by XVI Assistant City Civil

Court, Chennai and the order dated 25.09.2023 passed in I.A.No.4 of

2023 in O.S.No.5962 of 2016 by XVI Assistant City Civil Court,

Chennai.

For Petitioner

:

Mr.M.Praveen Kumar

[in both revisions]

For Respondents

:

No appearance

[in both revisions]

*****

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRP Nos.3973 & 3974 of 2023

ORDER

Challenging the impugned orders passed in I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of

2023 in O.S.No.5962 of 2016 dated 27.09.2023, these Civil Revision

Petitions have been filed.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/plaintiff submits

that the applications have been seeking to amend the plaint and to file

additional documents. On hearing both sides, the Trial Judge had

dismissed the same on the ground that after more than 7 years and after

the commencement of trial, the applications are not entertainable.

Aggrieved over the same, these civil revision petitions have been filed.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/plaintiff submits

that the learned Trial Judge has failed to consider the applications for

amendment and to file additional documents because those applications

are necessary for proper and effective adjudication of the dispute

between the petitioner and the respondents. Learned counsel further

submits that allowing of the amendment petition did not change the

nature of the suit.

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRP Nos.3973 & 3974 of 2023

4. Records perused. Considering the submissions made by the

learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/plaintiff and since the trial

has not commenced, the interlocutory applications in I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of

2023 in O.S.No.5962 of 2016 are allowed.

5. Accordingly, these Civil Revision Petitions are allowed. No

costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

21.12.2023

Index : Yes/No

Speaking/Non Speaking order

Neutral Citation:Yes/No

mp

To

1.The XVI Assistant City Civil Court,

Chennai.

2.The Section Officer,

VR-Section, High Court of Madras.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRP Nos.3973 & 3974 of 2023

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

mp

CRP.Nos.3973 & 3974 of 2023

21.12.2023

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top