MADRAS HIGH COURT
MANISHRAJA @ NARENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE THROUGH – Respondent
CRL OP/32696/2022
ANTCIPATORY BAIL - COTPA ACT - SECTION 24(1) - SECTION 328 IPC - Petitioner apprehends arrest for illegal possession of 135 kilograms of Gutkha - Petitioner willing to contribute to charitable trust - Anticipatory bail granted with conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner apprehends arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 24(1) of COTP Act r/w 328 of IPC, in Crime No.636 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police. The prosecution's case is that the accused were illegally transporting 135 kilograms of Guktha, in their cars.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the petitioner had filed two previous bail applications which were dismissed. However, considering that the petitioner was willing to contribute to a charitable trust and that similarly placed co-accused had been granted bail, the court was inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail for the offences punishable under Sections 24(1) of COTP Act r/w 328 of IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to anticipatory bail subject to certain conditions, including depositing a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the credit of Registered Advocate Clerks Association, Kancheepuram, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, and reporting before the respondent police on every Wednesday at 10.30a.m., for a period of twelve weeks.
Final Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
Crl.O.P.No.32696 of
2022
Crl.O.P.No.32696 of 2022
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent
Police for the offences punishable under Sections 24(1) of COTP Act r/w
328 of IPC, in Crime No.636 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police,
seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that when the respondent Police and
his team were on their regular patrol duty, they found that the accused were
illegally transporting 135 kilograms of Guktha, in their cars. Hence the case.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this is
the third bail application of this petitioner before this Court and this Court
had earlier dismissed the bail applications filed by the petitioner in
Crl.O.P.Nos.24671 & 26355 of 2022. He further submitted that the similarly
placed co-accused were released on bail by this Court. He also stated that
the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be
imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the
petitioner.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32696 of
2022
4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the
respondent submitted that the accused were in illegal possession of 135
kilograms of Gutkha in their car and the respondent has seized the same
along with the cars. He also stated that this is the third bail application of
this petitioner and on an earlier occasion, this Court has dismissed the
petitioner's bail application with cost. Hence, he vehemently opposed to
grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner, without
prejudice his rights, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute
some amount to any charitable trust as may be directed by this Court and he
prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions made by the
learned counsel and taking note of the fact that the petitioner without
prejudice his rights, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute
some amount to any charitable trust and also considering the fact that the
similarly placed co-accused were granted by this Court, this Court is inclined
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32696 of
2022
to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the
event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial
Magistrate Court, Sriperumbudur, on condition that the petitioner shall
execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand
Only) each, with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the
respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the
satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition
for anticipatory bail shall stands dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of
Registered Advocate Clerks Association, Kancheepuram,
within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before
the Court below;
[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their
photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond
and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar
card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32696 of
2022
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
ham
[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent
police on every Wednesday at 10.30a.m., for a period of
twelve weeks and thereafter, as and when required for
interrogation;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or
witn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.