SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14938

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL
VASANTHI SURESH – Appellant
Versus
SATHIYANESAN – Respondent


ORDER

This petition has been filed by the petitioner to set aside the judgment and conviction passed by the Mahila Fast Track Court, Nagercoil in Crl.A.No.93 of 2012 on 30.10.2018, in confirming the judgment and conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithurai in S.T.C.No.1506 of 2007 on 08.10.2012. In the trial Court, the complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act as against the petitioner and the trial Court convicted the accused and sentence him to undergo one year simple imprisonment and to pay a sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as compensation in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment by a judgment, dated 08.10.2012. As against the said conviction and judgment, the petitioner filed a criminal appeal in C.A.No.93 of 2012 and the same was disposed of by the Mahila Court (Fast Track Court), Nagercoil, by dismissing the appeal through its judgment dated 30.10.2018. Aggrieved by the said judgment, this present Criminal Revision Case is filed.

2.The case of the complainant is that on 03.12.2006, the petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- and for that, he gave a post dated cheque dated 03.02.2007 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top