SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 25602

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
Joseph S – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 4. Issuance of notice to the fifth respondent is dispensed with.

2.The fifth respondent had applied to the authorities for conducting survey. The authority is proposing to do that. The petitioner wants this Court to restrain the authorities from doing so. The stand of the petitioner is that when he applied for conducting survey, the authorities though measured the property, failed to give any survey report or survey sketch. Thereafter, the fifth respondent filed a civil suit. The suit is still pending. The learned counsel for the petitioner would argue that when the authorities are declining to conduct a proper survey and issue survey report and survey sketch for the petitioner's property, they cannot adopt different yardstick in the case of the fifth respondent.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would claim that even though the objection has been lodged by the petitioner, it has not been disposed of till date.

4.I decline to go into the merits of the matter only for the reason that the writ petition has been filed prematurely. A statutory authority can

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top