Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
C.V.Karthikeyan, J
M.Tamilselvan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. affidavit regarding information request (Para 2) |
| 2. second appeal filed for information (Para 3) |
| 3. order dated 30.04.2024 (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. counter affidavit by fourth respondent (Para 6) |
| 5. information sought protected under section 8 (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. amendment to section 8(j) (Para 9) |
| 7. personal information exempted from disclosure (Para 10) |
| 8. details in service register (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER
The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Certiorarified Mandamus seeking records relating to an order dated 30.04.2024 with specific reference to the direction in para No.8(2) of the said order passed by the first respondent, the Commissioner, the State Information Commission, Chennai and to set aide the same and direct the respondents to provide information sought by the petitioner in Application dated 01.02.2023.
2. In the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, it had been stated that the petitioners had sought information from the third respondent about the disproportionate wealth of an Assistant Engineer in the Water Reservoir Project Sub-Division, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, by application dated 01.02.2023. The information had not been
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
