SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 19303

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
ARJUNAN – Appellant
Versus
RAMASAMY – Respondent


ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition arises against the order passed by the learned II Additional District Munsif, Erode in I.A.No.3 of 2024 in O.S.No.442 of 2016.

2. The application in I.A.No.3 of 2024 was filed by the petitioner/third defendant. There is no dispute previously. Respondent Nos.1 and 2/plaintiffs have taken out an application for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner in I.A.No.1 of 2019 and an Advocate Commissioner also visited the suit schedule mentioned property and submitted a report. On the basis of the said report, the plaint was also amended and an additional written statement was also filed. The petitioner/third defendant, on the receipt of the Advocate Commissioner's report, also filed his objections and the same are on record.

3. When these proceedings have been completed, I.A.No.3 of 2024 was presented in order to appoint an Advocate Commissioner afresh to visit the suit schedule mentioned property, measure and fix boundaries of the property with the aid of title documents. The learned Trial Judge, after the receipt of a counter from the respondent Nos.1 and 2/plaintiffs, dismissed the application. Against which, the present Revision is filed.

4. It is not in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top