SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21144

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
P.Gnana Rajan – Appellant
Versus
Jehova Exim Private ltd. – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

The Civil Revision Petitions are filed as against the order dated

30.08.2023 made in I.A.Nos.15 and 16 of 2023 in O.S.No.538 of 2011 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Nagercoil.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that when the relevant documents are produced by the petitioner, the trial Court ought to have given an opportunity. When the pleadings regarding the documents are already taken and the plaintiff's side has also been cross examined, merely because the documents were not produced in the first instance, the same should not be shunted out. The production of the said documents are relevant to the proper and comprehensive decision on the lis. Therefore, he would submit that this Court should interfere.

3.I have considered the said submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material records of the case.

4.As a matter of fact, the trial Court considered the fact that originally when the defendant filed a written statement, no documents were produced. However, when the defendant's side evidence came, after the evidence commenced, once again an application was filed to recall and reopen the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top