HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
P.Gnana Rajan – Appellant
Versus
Jehova Exim Private ltd. – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
The Civil Revision Petitions are filed as against the order dated
30.08.2023 made in I.A.Nos.15 and 16 of 2023 in O.S.No.538 of 2011 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Nagercoil.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that when the relevant documents are produced by the petitioner, the trial Court ought to have given an opportunity. When the pleadings regarding the documents are already taken and the plaintiff's side has also been cross examined, merely because the documents were not produced in the first instance, the same should not be shunted out. The production of the said documents are relevant to the proper and comprehensive decision on the lis. Therefore, he would submit that this Court should interfere.
3.I have considered the said submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material records of the case.
4.As a matter of fact, the trial Court considered the fact that originally when the defendant filed a written statement, no documents were produced. However, when the defendant's side evidence came, after the evidence commenced, once again an application was filed to recall and reopen the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.