SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 10328

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S. SOUNTHAR
B.S.DINESH – Appellant
Versus
DURAISAMY – Respondent


ORDER

The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the First Appellate Court dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner seeking amendment of the plaint.

2. The petitioner herein filed a suit seeking rectification of boundary number in the Sale Deed executed in his favour as Document No.3182/2006, dated 15.06.2006 on the file of the Sub Registrar, Omalur. The petitioner sought for a direction to Sub Registrar, Omalur to rectify the defects by correcting the survey number as 93/2B instead of 93/1B. The suit was dismissed by the Trial Court mainly on the ground that the petitioner cannot seek a direction to Sub Registrar, Omalur to rectify the survey number instead he should have prayed for direction against respondents 1 to 5/defendants 1 to 5. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed an appeal in A.S.No.19 of 2017. Pending appeal, the petitioner filed a petition seeking amendment of the plaint so as to include a new prayer in the plaint seeking direction to respondents 1 to 5 to execute Rectification Deed in favour of plaintiff by correcting survey number as 93/2B instead of 93/1B. The said application was dismissed by the First Appellate Court on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top