SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 137

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.VIJAYAKUMAR
SREEKALA – Appellant
Versus
CHELLAPPAN PILLAI – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.K.Sreekumaran Nair, M/s.J.Anandhavalli

ORDER

One Sreekala, a third party to O.S.No.42 of 1983 had filed the present revision petition challenging an order passed in E.A.No.1 of 2019 rejecting her request to implead herself as 13th respondent in E.P.No.199 of 1993. 2. One Chellappan Pillai had filed O.S.No.42 of 1983 for the relief of declaration that they are entitled to have their plots demarcated and to lay boundary walls and also to restrain the defendants from causing any obstruction to the putting up of such boundary walls. The plaintiffs have further prayed for a decree to demarcate the southern partitions of Plot No.13 and southern 3 cents of Plot No.23 and to fix the alignment of boundary separating the plots of the plaintiffs from those of the defendants. The plaintiffs have further prayed for a decree to put up a mud boundary wall on the boundary as fixed under B-relief. The suit was decreed on 18.12.1991.

3. In order to execute the decree for demarcation of boundaries, the plaintiffs had filed E.P.No.199 of 1993. Pending execution proceedings, the present revision petitioner, namely Sreekala has filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 in E.A.No.1 of 2019 to implead herself in the said ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top