Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR
M/s.Shri Ramalinga Mills Pri – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Generation and Di – Respondent
Electricity - Security Deposit - Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code 2004 - Clause 5(5)(v) - The court directed the respondents to refund the excess security deposit paid by the petitioner as per the relevant provision of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, emphasizing the need for compliance with the regulatory body's order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a private company, sought a refund of Rs. 2,28,45,198, claiming excess security deposit under H.T.S.C. No. 079094620259 due to diminished power usage related to industry recession.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to a refund of the excess security deposit as mandated by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code?
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the regulatory framework that obligates the respondents to refund excess amounts held as security deposit and to follow the commission's orders regarding interest.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of directing the refund of the balance amount within one month.
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents, to make refund of Rs.2,28,45,198/- along with interest alias 6.75% from 01.04.2024 up to the date of full refund of the excess Security Deposit, which is kept pending unauthorizedly with the respondents, which is legally refundable to the petitioner for his H.T.S.C.No. 079094620259, as per Clause 5(5)
(v) of the TN Electricity Supply Code 2004.
2.Heard Mr.N.Sudalaimuthu, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Perused the materials available on record.
3. By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
4.The petitioner is a Private Company Limited and having H.T service connection No. 079094620259 connected under the respondent for supply of power to the petitioner's Mill. It is the case of the petitioner that due to continuous recession in the Textile industry, buying capacities of the Western countries have come down drastically. The same is not restored even now. Based on the poor utilization of power, the quantum of Security Deposit to be kept with the respondent has come down drastically. This has resulted into a situation, whereby, the Security Deposit paid by the petitioner with the respondent has become too high than the requirement and excess Security Deposit needs to be refunded to the petitioner as per the provision of Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code , 2004.
5.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, Chennai vide Order No.3 of 2024, dated 12.03.2024 has passed a common order directing the respondents to pay the interest and directed that the interest available in the accounts of the consumers as on 31.03.2024 shall be intimated to the consumers by 30.06.2024 and submit a compliance report to the Commission on or before
31.07.2024.
6.According to the petitioner, despite such a direction, the amount is not yet repaid. In this regard, he has given a representation, dated 08.08.2024 stating that a sum of Rs. 2,28,45,198/- is to be refunded to him including the interest for the security deposit. However, the same is not yet considered. Hence, this petition has been filed.
7.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per Clause
5(5)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code , 2004 the petitioner is entitled to get the refund.
8.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents has not disputed the order passed by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, Chennai. The only contention is that the respondent has returned certain amount to the petitioner. So that, a direction be given to the second respondent to calculate the same and pass orders to refund/adjust the remaining amount in the two future bills as per Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code , 2004.
9.In view of the above, there is no dispute with regard to the payment of interest as per Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code , 2004. Hence, the 3rd respondent is directed to adjust the amount payable to the petitioner for the two future bills and balance if any, the same shall be returned by way of cheque to the petitioner within a period of one month. The orders shall be passed within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order, so that if any adjustment should be made in the next bills.
10.With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
16.08.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No PNM To
1. The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, TANGEDCO, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.
2. The Director - Finance, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited TANGEDCO., 7th Floor, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.
3. The Superintending Engineer, Virudhunagar Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO., Limited, Virudhunaga
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
