SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11258

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Ganapathy – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner the Accused No.1 in C.C.No.4 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pudukkottai, filed this petition to quash the proceeding against him in C.C.No.4 of 2020.

2.The petitioner and other accused are said to have committed offence under Sections 120(B), 420, 465, 468, 471 and 506(i) of IPC. One Shanmugam and other accused executed a possessory farming right of the property situated at S.Nos.368/3, 368/4, 368/6, 368/7, 368/10, 368/12 and 368/13 measuring an extent of 4 acres and 83 cents, belonging to the defacto complainant's Sangam. In the said document, it is represented that one Shanmugam and other persons are in possession of the said properties and the possession was to the petitioner under the said deed. On the basis of the said deed, the accused/Village Administrative Officer issued the forged possessory certificate in the name of the remaining accused. Therefore, the Sangam preferred a complaint before the respondent Police and the respondent Police registered a case in Crime No.34 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 120(B), 420, 465, 468, 471 and 506(i) of IPC. Thereafter, the investigating agency completed the investigation and fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top