SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18175

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Bennetiet John Bosco – Appellant
Versus
REGINA RITA – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

These Review applications have been filed to graciously review the order dated 28.04.2023 passed in S.A.Nos.415 and 416 of 2016 by this Court.

2.The petitioner prays to review the order dated 28.04.2023 passed by this Court in S.A.Nos.415 and 416 of 2016 on the following grounds:

"1.The judgment passed by this Court is against law.

2.The respondent relied upon registered Will dated 24.08.2001 in respect of item No.2 of the suit property in O.S.No.796 of 2012 and the said Will, claimed to be in favour of the plaintiffs, has not been proved as provided under law viz. Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act.

3.The respondent herein relied upon another Will dated

07.11.2001 in respect of item 1 of the suit property in O.S.No.796 of 2012 and the said Will, claimed to be in favour of the plaintiffs, has not been proved as provided under law viz. Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act.

4.The Evidence of PW2, who is said to be the attestor of the Wills under Ex.A23 and A24 dated 24.08.2001 and 07.11.2001, does not satisfy the requirements of compliance of "attestation", within the meaning of Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top