HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J
B.L.Madhavan – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary – Respondent
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
The writ of mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take necessary actions against the 5th respondent.
2. The 5th respondent is an Advocate, enrolled in the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner is the owner of the building at No.20/1, 2nd Main Road, CIT Nagar, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. The petitioner inherited the property through his father, Mr.K.Balu. The petitioner entered into an agreement with the 5th respondent and the 5th respondent not only committed default in payment of rent but also occupied other portions of the building by creating forged lease agreements. After expiry of the original lease period, the 5th respondent is continuing in forcible occupation. The petitioner submitted a complaint before the Bar Council of India, before the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry and in Police Station. Since no action has been taken by the authorities the present writ petition came to be instituted.
3. The complaint has been primarily filed on the ground that the 5th respondent, being a lawyer, committed misconduct, not only by creating bogus rental agreement but forcibly occup
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.