SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 9798

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice BATTU DEVANAND
G.Sivasubramani, – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu, – Respondent


O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

2. The petitioners were working as Drivers in various local bodies in Dindigul District. Petitioners 1, 2 and 5 were appointed in the year 1999 and the petitioners 3, 4, 6 and 7 were appointed in the year 2000 and the 8th petitioner was appointed in the year 2001 and they have been receiving pay scale of Rs.5200-20200+2400 GP. According to the petitioners, they are Drivers working in the Government service have sought for revision of their pay scale on par with the Junior Assistants. On cosideration of the same, the State Government issued Go.Ms.No.65, Finance (PC) Department dated 26.02.2011 granting benefit of revision to pay scale of the Drivers on par with the Junior Assistants. But the monetary benefits was given effect from 01.03.2011. As such, it is the contention of the petitioner that the Drivers are entitled to Rs.5200-

20200+2400 GP.

3. It is an admitted fact that the corresponding selection grade pay for the pay band is Rs.5200-20200+2400 GP is Rs.9300-34800+Rs.4200 GP and Special Grade is Rs.9300

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top