HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J
P.SATHYA – Appellant
Versus
S.BHUVANESWARI – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
These petitions have been filed challenging the order passed by the Court below dismissing the applications filed in Crl MP No.16165 of
2023 under Section 311 of Cr.PC and Crl MP No.16164 of 2023, under Section 91 of Cr.PC.
2. The petitioner is facing trial for offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent / complainant examined himself as PW1. She was cross-examined in part on 21.03.2023. Thereafter, due to paucity of time, the case was adjourned. However, during the next hearing, she was not cross-examined. Hence, the evidence of PW1 was closed. The petitioner therefore filed an application under Section 311 of Cr.PC to recall PW1 for further cross examination.
3. The petitioner also relied upon a statement that was made by the respondent during cross examination that she is in possession of a dairy in which she has recorded all the transactions. Hence, the petitioner sought for a direction to the respondent to produce the said dairy by filing an application under Section 91 of Cr.PC.
4. The Court below dismissed both the applications and aggrieved by the same, these Criminal Original petitions have been filed before this Court.
5. Heard Mr.P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.