Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, J
R.Anitha Radhakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defacto complainant's complaint (Para 2) |
| 2. magistrate's consideration (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. power under section 319 (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. order confirmed (Para 22) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 09.09.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur, in Crl.M.P.No.2338 of 2019, wherein the learned Magistrate, upon considering the petition filed by the prosecution, invoked Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) and directed the summoning of Mr.Anitha Radhakrishnan, the sitting MLA of Tiruchendur, as an additional accused in Crime No.520 of 2009
2. The facts, as culled from the records, reveal the following:-
2.1. The defacto complainant, Mr.Damodaran, a member of the ADMK party, resides at Peyanvilai. Mr.Anitha Radhakrishnan, a member of the DMK party, is the sitting MLA of the Tiruchendur constituency. In December 2009, a by-election was announced for the Tiruchendur constituency following a vacancy. On the evening of 06.12.2009, at around 8:00 p.m., the defacto complainant, along with his associates Arasaguru, Sivaprakash, and Suresh Kumar, wer
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
