SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 22370

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR
MARIAPPAN.T – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent


ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.]

Seeking demolition of the unauthorized construction put up by the third and fourth respondents in the petition mentioned property, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation dated 21.09.2021 before the respondent Corporation pointing out some unauthorized construction put up by the third and fourth respondents. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner is constrained to file this writ petition.

3.The learned counsel for the third and fourth respondents submits that an application is made along along with the revised plan seeking approval of the same before the respondent Corporation and the same is pending.

4.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that based on the application made by the petitioner, the Assistant Engineer of Madurai Corporation inspected the property and measured its four boundaries. On such measurement, it is seen that the building was constructed against the approved plan. Hence, notice under Section 296(1) and (2) of the Corporation Act 1971 was issued on 10.08.2020 a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top