2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 91869
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Ms Justice R.N.MANJULA
DURAI AGED 39 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent
CRL A/230/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
CRL.A.NO.230 OF 2018
1) Durai
2) Parimala
... Appellants /
Accused 1 & 2
versus
State of Tamil Nadu
Represented by Inspector of Police,
Kanjanoor Police Station,
Crime No.109/2015
Villupuram District.
... Respondent
PRAYER:
Criminal Appeal filed under section 374 of the Criminal
Procedure Code, against the order of conviction passed by the
learned Court of Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, (Fast
Track Court), Villupuram in S.C.No.11 of 2016 dated 08.03.2018.
For Appellants : Dr.S.Manoharan
For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath,
Government Advocate (Crl. side)
J U D G M E N T
This Criminal Appeal has been preferred challenging the
judgment of the learned Court of Sessions Judge, Magalir
Neethimandram, (Fast Track Court), Villupuram in S.C.No.11 of
2016, dated 08.03.2018, convicting the first appellant under
Sections 326 and 304(1) of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter
referred to as 'I.P.C.') and the second appellant under Section
326 of I.P.C.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The appellants herein, were the first and second accused
before the Trial Court. The case of the prosecution is that, on
13.07.2015 at about 6:30 p.m., when P.W.1/ Ananth was returning
from Nemmur through Mathakoil street and when he was coming near
the water pipe behind the house of one Iruthayam, the sister of
the first accused, namely Rosy intercepted P.W.1 and queried
about the misunderstanding and fight that existed between the
said P.W.1 and the first accused. At that time, the first
accused, who was inside his house came with an iron rod and
picked up a quarrel with him by stating that how could P.W.1
talk to his sister Rosy, when he had refused to do business with
him. By stating so, he attacked P.W.1 with iron rod on his right
eye, left ear, left and right knees, nose and on his right hand.
At that time, the aunt of P.W.1, Rahini came for his rescue and
to prevent the quarrel between them. But the first accused
attacked Rahini with the same iron rod on the backside of her
head. At that time, the wife of the first accused, who is the
second accused herein, took a wooden log and pushed Rahini down
and attacked her with the wooden log and as a result of which
Rahini succumbed to the injuries. Hence, the 1st and 2nd accused
have been charged for the offence under Sections 341, 294(b),
326 & 302 of I.P.C.
3. On the same day itself i.e., on 13.07.2015, at about
21:30 hours, a complaint was given by P.W.1 and the Sub
Inspector of Police, Kanjanur Police Station registered a case
in Crime No.109 of 2015 under Sections 294(b), 341, 324, 323 &
302 of I.P.C. and prepared the F.I.R. (Ex.P.12). Then, the
Circle Inspector of Police, Kanjanur Police Station (P.W.12)
took up the case for investigation on 14.07.2015. He went to the
place of occurrence and prepared the Observation Mahazar
(E.x.P.2), rough sketch (Ex.P.13) in the presence of one Bala
(P.W.10) and one Karnan (P.W.7). Thereafter, P.W.12 went to
Mundiyampakkam Government Hospital and conducted the inquest
over the body of the deceased in the presence of the witnesses,
namely P.Ws 1 to 6 and prepared the inquest report (Ex.P.14). He
arrested the 1st and 2nd accused on the same day near
Arasalapuram Madha Koil and recorded the confession statement
given by the first accused in the presence of one
Mr.Sundaramoorthi, Village Administrative Officer, (P.W.9) and
the Village Assistant, namely Sakthivel. The admissible portion
of the confession statement of the first accused has been marked
as Ex.P.16.
4. In pursuance of the confession of the first accused,
P.W.12 recovered the material objects (M.O. 1 & 2) in the
presence of P.W.9 and the Village Assistant covered under the
https://hcservi