2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65553
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Ms Justice R.N.MANJULA
V.Padmini – Appellant
Versus
Nil – Respondent
CRP/1981/2022
CRP(PD)No.1981 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
CRP(PD).No.1981 of 2022
V. Padmini
... Petitioner
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of
India to set aside the Docket order dated 21.02.2022 passed in
O.P.S.R.No.5126 of 2021 by the District Judge, Chengalpet by allowing this
CRP.
For Petitioner
: Mr.B.Balaji for
Mr.R.Chellamuthu
For Respondent
: Nil
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the written
endorsement made by the learned District Judge, Chengalpet dated 21.02.2022.
2. The revision petitioner is the petitioner who has filed the original
petition before the District Court, Chengalpet to appoint herself as a guardian
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(PD)No.1981 of 2022
for the person and property of her mentally retarded son Mr.Ambaresh
Varathan. The learned District Judge has returned the plaint on 21.02.2022 with
the following endorsement:
"As per Mental Health Act, 2017 (10 of 2017) when came into
force with effect from 07.07.2018 and Mental Health Act 1987 has been
Repealed. Hence this petition is returned".
3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that "The
Mental Health Act, 1987" was repealed and was replaced by the Mental
Healthcare Act, 2017 which came into effect from 07.07.2018 and in the new
Act there is no specific provision available in the special Act for appointment
of guardian for the mentally ill person. Since the gap has to be filled up only by
way of filing an appropriate original petition before the jurisdictional Court, the
revision petitioner had filed the petition before the District Court, Chengalpet.
In this connection it is relevant to refer the order passed by this Court dated
27.01.2022 made in OP.No.731 of 2021 in which Hon'ble Mr.Justice Abdul
Quddhose has held as follows:-
12. Section 53 of the repealed Mental Health Act 1987 reads as
follows:-
53. Appointment of guardian of mentally ill person (1) Where
the mentally ill person is incapable of taking care of himself, the
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(PD)No.1981 of 2022
District Court or, where a direction has been issued under sub-section
(2) of Section 54, the Collector of the District, may appoint any
suitable person to be his guardian.
(2) In the discharge of his functions under sub-section (1) the
Collector shall be subject to the supervision and control of the State
Government or of any authority appointed by it in that behalf.
13. The Mental Health Act, 1987 was repealed and was
replaced by the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 which came into effect
from 07.07.2018. As seen from the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, there
is no provision available for appointment of a guardian of a mentally
ill person, which was very much available under the repealed Mental
Health Act, 1987. Though the National Trust for Welfare of persons
with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple
Disabilities Act, 1999 under Section 14 empowers the Local Level
Committee to appoint a legal guardian for a mentally retarded person,
the said legislation has not curtailed the powers of this Court to
appoint a legal guardian for a mentally retarded person exercising its
powers under Clause 17 of the Letters Patent. The decision rendered
by a learned Single Judge of this Court in G.Nithyanandam Vs.
Tmt.D.Saritha and others reported in 2013 3 LW 412 which is the
basis for the return of the Original Petition by the Registry of this
Court is in the context of a petition filed under the Guardians and
Wards Act and not under Clause 17 of the Letters Patent. The only
reason for holding that the said petition was not maintainable by the
learned Single Judge in the reported decision of G.Nithyanandam's
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(PD)No.1981 of 2022
case referr