MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
SURESH KUMAR @ KUTHIRAI SURESH – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
CRL OP/12908/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.06.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.OP.No.12908 of 2022
1.Suresh Kumar @ Kuthirai Suresh
2.Karthi @ Deo Karthi .. Petitioners
Vs.
The State represented by
Inspector of Police,
Muthupetai Police Station,
Thiruvarur District
Crime No.87 of 2022
.. Respondent
PRAYER:
Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime No.87 of 2022
pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioners : Mr.P.Muthamizhselvakumar
For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran,
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial
custody on 23.03.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections
294(b), 353, 307, 120 B of IPC r/w 25(1)(a), 27(2) of Arms Act, 1959
in crime No.87 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek
bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that when the respondent
police were in usual beat duty, the petitioners and another were
found in suspicious manner. When the respondent intercepted them,
they tried to escape from that place. At that time, one,
Manthiramoorthy tried to attack the police with aruval. However he
escaped. The other two accused persons intimidated with dire
consequences by showing deadly weapons. Hence the case.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit
that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely
implicated in this case. Hence, he seeks for grant of bail to the
petitioners.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the
first accused tried to attack the respondent police with aruval.
However, no injury was caused. He would further submit that the
respondent police found that they were planning to murder the person
who murdered one, Rajesh. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail
to the petitioners.
5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this
Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the
petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a
separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only)
(each) with two blood related sureties, each for a like sum to the
satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court,
Thiruthuraipoondi and on further conditions that:
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb
Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of
their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioners shall stay at Villupuram and report before
the Inspector of Police, Villupuram Taluk Police Station, Villupuram
daily at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation
or trial.
[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness
either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned
Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against
the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been
imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned
Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be
registered under Section 229A IPC.
-sd/-
07/06/2022
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Mad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.